Meilleures GPU Cloud avec VRAM 24+ Go — June 2026

Les GPU avec 24 Go+ de VRAM permettent l'inférence de modèles de 13B à 30B, des tailles de lots plus importantes et des fenêtres de contexte plus longues.

Mis à jour Juin 2026 Affichage de 30 modèles de GPU VRAM 24 Go+
NVIDIA 384 GB
GB200 Superchip
HBM3e Blackwell
VRAM 384 GB
NVIDIA 288 GB
B300
HBM3e Blackwell Ultra
VRAM 288 GB
AMD 288 GB
MI350X
HBM3e CDNA 4
VRAM 288 GB
AMD 288 GB
MI355X
HBM3e CDNA 4 $2.59/hr
VRAM 288 GB
AMD 256 GB
MI325X
HBM3e CDNA 3 $2.00/hr
VRAM 256 GB
NVIDIA 192 GB
B200
HBM3e Blackwell $1.99/hr
VRAM 192 GB
NVIDIA 192 GB
B100
HBM3e Blackwell
VRAM 192 GB
AMD 192 GB
MI300X
HBM3 CDNA 3 $1.85/hr
VRAM 192 GB
NVIDIA 141 GB
H200 SXM
HBM3e Hopper $2.05/hr
VRAM 141 GB
NVIDIA 96 GB
GH200 Superchip
HBM3 Hopper
VRAM 96 GB
NVIDIA 80 GB
H100 SXM
HBM3 Hopper $1.57/hr
VRAM 80 GB
NVIDIA 80 GB
A100 SXM (80GB)
HBM2e Ampere $1.10/hr
VRAM 80 GB
NVIDIA 64 GB
A16
GDDR6 Ampere $0.47/hr
VRAM 64 GB
NVIDIA 48 GB
L40S
GDDR6 Ada Lovelace $0.55/hr
VRAM 48 GB
NVIDIA 48 GB
L40
GDDR6 Ada Lovelace
VRAM 48 GB
NVIDIA 48 GB
A40
GDDR6 Ampere $0.30/hr
VRAM 48 GB
NVIDIA 40 GB
A100 SXM (40GB)
HBM2e Ampere $0.80/hr
VRAM 40 GB
NVIDIA 24 GB
A30
HBM2e Ampere $0.25/hr
VRAM 24 GB
NVIDIA 24 GB
L4
GDDR6 Ada Lovelace $0.39/hr
VRAM 24 GB
NVIDIA 24 GB
A10G
GDDR6 Ampere
VRAM 24 GB
NVIDIA 96 GB
RTX PRO 6000
GDDR7 Blackwell $1.71/hr
VRAM 96 GB
NVIDIA 48 GB
RTX 6000 Ada
GDDR6 Ada Lovelace $0.47/hr
VRAM 48 GB
NVIDIA 48 GB
RTX A6000
GDDR6 Ampere $0.30/hr
VRAM 48 GB
NVIDIA 32 GB
RTX 5000 Ada
GDDR6 Ada Lovelace
VRAM 32 GB
NVIDIA 24 GB
RTX A5000
GDDR6 Ampere
VRAM 24 GB
NVIDIA 24 GB
RTX 4500 Ada
GDDR6 Ada Lovelace
VRAM 24 GB
NVIDIA 32 GB
RTX 5090
GDDR7 Blackwell $0.34/hr
VRAM 32 GB
NVIDIA 24 GB
RTX 4090
GDDR6X Ada Lovelace $0.28/hr
VRAM 24 GB
NVIDIA 24 GB
RTX 3090
GDDR6X Ampere $0.12/hr
VRAM 24 GB
NVIDIA 24 GB
RTX 3090 Ti
GDDR6X Ampere
VRAM 24 GB

What 24 GB of VRAM actually unlocks

Filtering for 24 GB or more of GPU memory is one of the most meaningful thresholds you can set when renting cloud compute. VRAM is the hard ceiling on what fits on a single device: model weights, the KV cache during inference, activations and optimizer states during training, and your working batch of data all have to live in that memory at once. Once you cross into 24 GB, a large class of modern models stops requiring multi-GPU sharding or aggressive offloading and starts running comfortably on one card, which is simpler to schedule, cheaper to rent, and easier to reason about.

The 24 GB line is not arbitrary. It is the capacity of several widely deployed accelerators, so the supply of instances at this tier is deep and competition keeps hourly rates reasonable. The comparison above shows which specific instances clear this bar and what they currently cost.

Which workloads fit on a 24 GB GPU

This tier is the sweet spot for a great deal of practical AI work, especially inference and parameter-efficient fine-tuning:

  • Inference on mid-sized language models: a 7B-to-13B-class model in 16-bit precision needs roughly 14–26 GB just for weights, so 24 GB comfortably serves a quantized 13B model or a full-precision 7B model with room left for the KV cache that grows with context length and concurrency.
  • Larger models when quantized: with 4-bit or 8-bit weight quantization, models in the 30B range and beyond can be squeezed onto a single 24 GB card for inference, trading a little accuracy for the ability to avoid renting two GPUs.
  • LoRA and QLoRA fine-tuning: parameter-efficient methods only update a small adapter, so you can fine-tune surprisingly large base models on 24 GB. Full fine-tuning of large models, which must hold optimizer states for every weight, generally does not fit here.
  • Diffusion and image generation: text-to-image models, high-resolution generation, and moderate batch sizes run well, with headroom for higher resolutions than 12–16 GB cards allow.
  • Rendering, simulation and classic GPU compute: 24 GB handles large 3D scenes, complex shaders, and many HPC kernels where the dataset must stay resident on the device.

Where 24 GB starts to hurt is full pre-training or full fine-tuning of large models, very long context windows at high concurrency (the KV cache can balloon past the weights), and serving many simultaneous users at low latency. Those jobs push you toward 40 GB, 80 GB, or multi-GPU configurations.

Memory type matters as much as the number

Two GPUs can both advertise 24 GB and behave very differently. The key distinction is memory technology:

  • GDDR6 / GDDR6X appears on consumer and workstation-class cards. It delivers strong bandwidth at a low rental price, which is excellent for single-stream inference, fine-tuning experiments, and rendering.
  • HBM2 / HBM2e / HBM3 appears on data-center accelerators and offers substantially higher memory bandwidth. For memory-bound inference, where throughput is limited by how fast weights can be streamed, that bandwidth translates directly into more tokens per second.

If your workload is latency- or throughput-sensitive, read the instance details in the comparison above for the memory type, not just the GB figure. Also check whether the card supports the lower precisions modern inference relies on — FP16 and BF16 are near-universal, while FP8 and efficient INT8 paths are tied to newer architectures and can multiply effective throughput.

Rental and cost considerations at this tier

The 24 GB segment is one of the best-value brackets in cloud GPU rental precisely because the underlying hardware is mass-produced and widely available. A few things to weigh:

  • On-demand vs spot/interruptible: because supply is plentiful, spot and interruptible instances at this tier are usually available and can cut costs dramatically for fault-tolerant batch work that can checkpoint and resume.
  • Billing granularity: per-second or per-minute billing matters most for short, bursty inference jobs and interactive notebook sessions; check the billing model in the list above.
  • Single vs multi-GPU: at 24 GB you can often stay on one card, which sidesteps interconnect concerns entirely. If you do scale out, note whether the instance offers NVLink or only PCIe, since that affects multi-GPU training efficiency.
  • Storage and egress: model checkpoints and datasets are large; confirm persistent storage options and any egress fees before committing to a provider.

Compared with cheaper 12–16 GB instances, the 24 GB tier buys you the ability to run a meaningfully larger model without sharding. Compared with the pricier 40–80 GB tier, you give up the ability to hold the very largest models or to train at scale, but you pay a fraction of the hourly rate. For most fine-tuning experiments and production inference of mid-sized models, 24 GB is the rational default.

Frequently asked questions

Is 24 GB enough to run a large language model?

It depends on model size and precision. A 7B model fits in full 16-bit precision, and 13B-class models fit when quantized to 4-bit or 8-bit, with room for a modest KV cache. Models in the 30B+ range require heavy quantization to fit on a single 24 GB card, and the largest models need 40 GB, 80 GB, or multiple GPUs.

Can I fine-tune on a 24 GB cloud GPU?

Yes, for parameter-efficient methods. LoRA and QLoRA let you fine-tune large base models because only a small adapter and, with QLoRA, a quantized base are kept in memory. Full fine-tuning, which stores optimizer states for every weight, generally exceeds 24 GB except for smaller models.

Do all 24 GB GPUs perform the same?

No. Two cards with identical 24 GB capacity can differ greatly in memory bandwidth depending on whether they use GDDR6/GDDR6X or HBM, and in supported precisions like FP8 and INT8. For throughput-sensitive inference, the memory type and tensor capabilities matter as much as the capacity, so compare the per-instance details above.

Should I pick spot instances at this tier?

For fault-tolerant batch jobs that can checkpoint and resume, spot or interruptible instances at the 24 GB tier are often plentiful and substantially cheaper. For latency-sensitive production serving or long uninterrupted training runs, on-demand instances are safer. Check current availability and pricing in the comparison above.

GB200 Superchip vs B300 vs MI350X — meilleurs choix de ce guide

GB200 Superchip vs B300 vs MI350X
GB200 Superchip
Blackwell · 384 GB
B300
Blackwell Ultra · 288 GB
MI350X
CDNA 4 · 288 GB
Spécifications
Fabricant NVIDIA NVIDIA AMD
Architecture Blackwell Blackwell Ultra CDNA 4
VRAM 384 GB HBM3e 288 GB HBM3e 288 GB HBM3e
Bande passante 16,000 GB/s 8,000 GB/s 8,000 GB/s
FP16 (Tensor) 4,500 TFLOPS 2,250 TFLOPS 1,800 TFLOPS
FP32 150 TFLOPS 75 TFLOPS 72 TFLOPS
TDP 2700 W 1400 W 1000 W
Année de sortie 2024 2025 2025
Segment Centre de données Centre de données Centre de données
Tarification Cloud
Le moins cher à la demande
Fournisseurs 0 1 1

Créez votre propre comparaison de GPU

Sélectionnez 2 GPU de ce guide et ouvrez-les côte à côte.

Astuce : les comparaisons de GPU se font par paires. Choisissez exactement 2 — si vous ne sélectionnez rien, nous ouvrirons les 2 premiers de ce guide.